The 2025 National Policy for the prevention, management and control of Alcohol,
Drugs and Substance Abuse
sparked a lot of
hullabaloo as soon as it was released resulting into the National Authority for
Campaign against Alcohol and Drug Abuse (NACADA) issuing a clarification
statement hours later.
One of
policy statements that provoked the public debate was raising the minimum legal
age for purchasing, consuming and selling alcohol in Kenya from 18 years to 21
years
I actually support
this policy direction based on the proven fact that alcohol
can seriously affect a young brain. Research has consistently shown that drinking
before the brain fully matures can mess with memory, learning, and
decision-making resulting in
noticeable problems with attention and memory. In addition, starting
to drink alcohol early also increases the risk of alcohol addiction later in life.
In actual fact
the part of the brain responsible for decision making, judgment and impulse
control continues to develop up to mid years of 20s and so from a purely
scientific point of view we should be leaning towards raising the minimum age
of drinking from 18 years to 25 years and not just 21 years. 21 years is
therefore not a magic number but it is chosen because many societies have come
to accept it. Societies have therefore had to balance the science and social
acceptance.
Alcohol is
also a gateway to using other substances and so waiting until 21
years of age to use substances like alcohol, nicotine,
and marijuana therefore protects brain development, reduces addiction risk, and promotes
long-term well-being.
The other policy direction was on easy access of
alcohol. It is clear that for example online sale of alcohol and home delivery
significantly weakens the ability to verify age making it easy for underage and
those with addiction problems to easily access alcohol. Further, the 2022 WHO report
indicated that digital programs and delivery services negate face to face
verification of age hence making it easy for under age to access the alcohol
The reason
the society should put more effort in reducing access and therefore use of
alcohol throughout the ages and especially in the age when one is likely to get
addicted easily is that; it is now confirmed that alcohol even if taken in
moderation is not only toxic, interferes with the brains executive function,
causes addiction and also predisposes one to cancer in proportions similar to asbestos,
radiation and tobacco. In fact, alcohol has specifically been strongly
associated with predisposing one to bowel cancer and female breast cancer. Kenyans
should also know that any beverage containing alcohol, regardless of its price
and quality, is a risk of developing cancer. This should therefore dissuade
Kenyans from thinking that if a brand is very expensive then it is safe. We
should therefore reduce the middle-class culture of show casing the most
expensive brands when they through a party deluded that just because it is
licit and expensive, it is safe.
All this
said and done, let’s not forget that most people use substances to try and heal
their unhealed trauma wounds. We should know that people with alcohol use
disorder would go to all length to access alcohol regardless of the policies,
laws and the level enforcement. We should therefore also put effort in parent
training, training in life skills among pupils and students and higher learning
institutions and teach problem solving to increase resilience. Economic
empowerment is also key in reducing alcohol use disorders. Childhood and later
life trauma healing therapy is also key in ensuring we have a healthy nation.
Above all let us support and not punish those who end up with alcohol use disorder
but instead link them up for treatment.
For those
dealing with alcohol use disorder, proper assessment by qualified mental health
provider, correct diagnosis and effective holistic management is available.
No comments:
Post a Comment